Company With “Best in Class” HR Settles $3 Million Discrimination Suit
by John Hollon Maplewood-based 3M公司已经同意花费300万美元来解决美国平等就业委员会所提出的关于该公司在企业经营中对于员工年龄歧视问题的诉讼，具体内容见下文详解。
Read these two statements and see if you can figure out which companies they refer to: We believe our human resource practices are fair, comply with federal and state laws and are widely recognized as best in class. (Company X) has agreed to pay $3 million to settle an age-discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency said Monday. It is the third age-discrimination lawsuit (Company X) has settled this year. Give up? Would you believe that these two statements are referring to the very same organization? 3M pays millions in age discrimination settlement Yes, according to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Minnesota-based 3M paid millions of dollars to settle an age discrimination lawsuit this week. How that squares with the company s claim they are widely recognized as best in class for HR practices is anyone s guess. Here s the gist of the story: Maplewood-based 3M Co. has agreed to pay $3 million to settle an age-discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency said Monday. It is the third age-discrimination lawsuit 3M has settled this year. The EEOC charged that 3M unlawfully laid off hundreds of employees over the age of 45 from July 1, 2003, through Dec. 31, 2006. 3M laid off many highly paid older employees, apparently to save money, and cut workers in salaried positions up to the level of director, the agency said. Pending judicial approval, the settlement will be paid to approximately 290 former employees, and 3M will post openings for positions it had not advertised previously to enable older employees to apply. The company agreed to establish a review process for termination decisions and to conduct training on how to prevent age bias. In March, 3M announced it had reached a preliminary settlement of $12 million on a suit filed in Minnesota in 2004. That case affected as many as 7,000 current and former employees. The company reached an undisclosed agreement this spring in a separate case filed in 2009 in San Jose, Calif. Best in class HR practices? Now, 3M does claim that the settlement with the EEOC is not an admission of any liability, and that it was done largely to to avoid taking up more time and paying more in legal expense. 3M denies the allegations in the suit, said 3M spokesperson Donna Runyon said. We believe our human resource practices are fair, comply with federal and state laws and are widely recognized as best in class. OK, I get the notion of settling the lawsuit to cut your losses. That s a pragmatic decision, but does 3M really believe that anyone in the world will buy the bit about the company having best in class HR practices after they just paid out millions of dollars in a settlement over employee discrimination? Somehow, I don t think best in class human resource operations are being forced to do that these days. And then there s this, from the Star-Tribune report: According to an EEOC investigation based out of the San Francisco office, older employees at 3M were denied leadership training and laid off to make way for younger leaders, according to the agency, which is responsible for enforcing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. The agency s investigation found an employee e-mail describing then-CEO Jim McNerney s vision for leadership development as we should be developing 30-year-olds with general manager potential. The law requires employers to base employment decisions upon each person s strengths and talents instead of relying upon generalized assumptions calculated around an employee s age, said the EEOC s Michael Baldonado. Is this what smart HR organizations do? Yes, organizations with best in class HR practices don t make it a habit of dealing with their older workers this way. It s always great to develop younger talent and move them into the management pipeline, but smart HR organizations know you don t do that at the expense of your older (and more experienced) workers. It should never be a choice of one or the other. I hate to be so hard on 3M, but then again, they were the ones who decided to talk about how they have best in class human resource practices wedged into an announcement about a $3 million age discrimination settlement with the EEOC. When did age discrimination become part of best in class HR? Maybe some sharp HR pro out there can weigh in on how you make THAT work. 管理新知 您可能感兴趣的文章 员工激励有方法 90后也可以很靠谱。你不得不了解的管理知识！！！
2015-01-04 Sleeping on the Job? Now That’s a Workforce Trend I Can Get Into 2011-08-22 HR微语—领导用人的方圆艺术 2012-10-19 最近文章 嫖娼被抓不属无故旷工，公司解雇赔4万！（法院判决） 2018年01月15日 如何判断你是否具有HRBP胜任力？
2018年01月15日 阿里为什么不去清华招人？
2018年01月15日 因利益冲突，Facebook COO和Twitter CEO退出迪士尼董事会 2018年01月15日 沪调整城乡居民养老保险有关标准 24日前可就近办理 2018年01月13日 热门文章 嫖娼被抓不属无故旷工，公司解雇赔4万！（法院判决） 2018年01月15日 如何判断你是否具有HRBP胜任力？
2018年01月15日 阿里为什么不去清华招人？
2018年01月15日 2017年度职场出差行程调查，出差最多的居然是他们！！
2018年01月12日 员工在自己QQ空间评论HR经理吃屎，可辞退他吗？
2018年01月11日 扫一扫 加微信【已隐去】 关于沙龙 顾问委员 广告推广 隐私安全 联系我们 申请vip会员 支付方式 市场合作或广告投放 电话：【电话已隐去】 邮件：【邮箱已隐去】 在线QQ【已隐去】 VIP会员 企业VIP会员 机构VIP会员 广告刊例 商务合作 Follow HRSalon