What Game of Thrones Can Teach Us About Leadership

历年文章· 2013-12-11· 0 浏览

There are many lessons we can learn from The Game of Thrones...this is only one of them. I'm nearly done the third season of Game of Thrones (I know I'm behind!) and one of my favorite story lines is with Daenerys Targaryen (the mother of dragons) and her coming of age while being the Khaleesi of the Dothraki. I promise I won't give any spoilers, but there is one line that bears revealing: The Dothraki follow strength above all. It's a lesson that Daenerys' advisor, Jorah, repeats to her as she's trying to figure out how to navigate her new position. While other tribes in the various kingdoms follow self-proclaimed or inherited leaders, the Dothraki have a high respect for those who have the strength to lead, no matter what bloodline they follow. In other words, the Dothraki are about as meritocratic as they come (). You get to lead as long as you ARE a leader. If someone else shows themselves to be more capable, you are out. And leadership is more than just displaying brute strength, something the Dothraki seem to also value. Leadership can also be wisdom and insight and knowing how to care for one's people. Therefore, the Dothraki, though they seem very brutish, are incredibly advanced in their thinking. The best leader for the situation becomes the leader. In the non-Dothraki world we live in, leadership style doesn't always seem to suit the situation. In fact, most of our leadership rules resemble the kingdoms of Westeros. Whether it is anointing former-Googlers as having earned a pedigree (whether founding employees or not) or looking for the next Steve Jobs, we assign the same thinking to leadership over and over again, no matter the situation. Lucky for us, the definition of what makes a leader is changing because of people who, like a Dothraki leader, step up and show their strengths are the strengths that are needed at the moment. I'm thinking of people like Tony Hsieh from Zappos (who demonstrated a CEO can win by focusing on culture and happiness, without a corner office or real hierarchy) or Marissa Mayer's leadership at Yahoo! (whose focus on data is legendary and who is a product person, not a business person) or the

20 female senators who led the US out of the government shutdown with their willingness to cooperate. Their surprising leadership styles emerged in the right situations. Sometimes we need the business mind of a seasoned CEO and sometimes we need a leader with strong empathy skills and sometimes what we need is something completely different. Leaders lead. They step up and do what needs to be done without being given a position. Saying someone is a leader doesn't make them one. For those of you who have seen the series, I have two words to illustrate this: Joffrey Baratheon. When Cersei Lannister arrogantly asserts that Power is power, she's underscoring the problem with treating leadership like a zero-sum game, where those who are in power deserve to be there because they have the power. This system benefits nobody. The motivation is power. I'm the best, I deserve this, when it is really just our job to do the right thing and move humanity forward. Our special skills will be needed again. No need to get greedy. As I've watched through the seasons, I keep seeing characters die or lead others to their death because of an insane focus on gaining and/or keeping power. It all seems to come from this awful place of insecurity all caused by the fact that there is this one throne to rule them all. And I'm not even really sure why people want to sit in it...it seems uncomfortable and like it's a crappy job. But what I really wonder is, if we were to make leadership truly meritocratic and non zero-sum (no one throne to rule them all), would that insecurity dissipate? Or would it be aggravated? I'm curious to know what you think. --------------------------------------------------------- END NOTES: In the irony of it all, I'm writing this post from the 'throne' of 'LinkedIN Influencer' (curious distinction, really), so who am I to talk? And boy oh boy, it feels goooood to be given the ability to amplify my ideas instead of clamoring for attention. But it doesn't always mean I deserve it. In fact, there are many ideas out there that deserve attention and they DON'T always bubble up to the top. Attention is finite. And one more question as I wrap this thought up awkwardly... If LinkedIN is like Westeros, is Reddit like Essos? 管理新知您可能感兴趣的文章 HR微语—由“商鞅变法”谈企业管理 2013-05-13 在通往成功的路上，怎样避免职业倦怠？

2017-01-06 好消息！五险二金终于来了！今天起每年能多领一笔钱，直到退休！

2018-01-09 最近文章 TEST 2018年01月15日嫖娼被抓不属无故旷工，公司解雇赔4万！（法院判决） 2018年01月15日如何判断你是否具有HRBP胜任力？

2018年01月15日阿里为什么不去清华招人？

2018年01月15日因利益冲突，Facebook COO和Twitter CEO退出迪士尼董事会 2018年01月15日热门文章嫖娼被抓不属无故旷工，公司解雇赔4万！（法院判决） 2018年01月15日如何判断你是否具有HRBP胜任力？

2018年01月15日阿里为什么不去清华招人？

2018年01月15日 2017年度职场出差行程调查，出差最多的居然是他们！！

2018年01月12日员工在自己QQ空间评论HR经理吃屎，可辞退他吗？

2018年01月11日扫一扫加微信【已隐去】关于沙龙顾问委员广告推广隐私安全联系我们申请vip会员支付方式市场合作或广告投放电话：【电话已隐去】邮件：【邮箱已隐去】在线QQ【已隐去】 VIP会员企业VIP会员机构VIP会员广告刊例商务合作 Follow HRSalon